Traveling with the foster couple during the declining health of my mother but before her death put me as a young boy arriving at the ashram of the venerated Indian holy man the Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi in Tiruvannamalai south India sometime in early January 1944 and staying to sometime after April of 1944. SRI RAMANA MAHARSHI: The Last American Darshan I missed the funeral and by the time I got back my family had disintegrated, my two brothers and myself all going separate ways, my dad disappearing into the countryside heavy into alcohol."
#Triply twistit mobius space full#
Before my dad had a chance to respond to the couple, the couple, knowing full well that my mother was in a sanatorium, without my father's grace, took me to India, simply sending him a note saying that in the end I had changed my mind about going. "(U)nknown to me, my mother was no longer at home, having become totally unable to care for herself, so much so my dad placed her into a full care sanatorium-like hospital in Santa Barbara, California on an around the clock basis. The seed of what is behind that happenstance and how it was able to come into play to such a point that it could, would and did actually transpire, was initially set into motion primarily through the downstream outflow of the following: The above sentence, based on a real life happenstance, is found in the text toward the bottom of The Spiritual Elder and the Santa Fe Chief. One of me quite possibly knowing my mother died, the other still having a mother alive." "There had to be in existence two of me at the same time, albeit occupying separate spaces. If Hadley is wrong, the question is how did what happen, happen? Somewhere, if Hadley type views are not acceptable as being feasible there had to have been a breakdown in the traditional orientability allowing non-traditional aspects of time to breakthrough and function on a macro level. The following six paradoxes, in that they are actually known to have transpired in real life on the conventional plane, are called paradoxes only because their unfolding as such flies in the face of the traditional view of the orientability of spacetime - skewing more towards how Hadley has explained it.
#Triply twistit mobius space pdf#
In a highly credible other view, there is an active PDF link toward the bottom of the page that will take you to a rather extensive work by the noted physicist Stephen Hawking titled The Large Scale Structure of Space Time. The first of the two links below, which includes Hadley's paper, have a favorable tendency toward support of the potential possibility of non-orientability if not an explanation of what it is. However, as might be expected, since what he has to say goes against general observation and innate experience, not everyone agrees with Hadley and scientists like him or those of a similar ilk.
So said then, setting the scene for the rest of the contents of Hadley's paper. That is to say, according to Hadley, what is false is that there is NO evidence for a LACK of orientability nor is there any evidence proving that a nonorientable spacetime would be incompatible with the observed violations of parity and time reversal invariance - there are theories and conceptual constructs, but NO evidence. What is not shown is the sentence that immediately follows the aforementioned quote that reads: Hadley, is found in The Orientability of Spacetime, reached through the first link below. Arguments are that there is no evidence of a lack of orientability and that a nonorientable spacetime would be incompatible with the observed violations of P (parity) and T (time reversal invariance)." "It is widely believed that spacetime must be both orientable and time-orientable.
0 kommentar(er)
